MAGA Is Gaslighting You: The Cost of Waking Up in an Authoritarian America
A reckoning for those who still believe in truth but feel abandoned by a system that rewards lies, fear, and tribal loyalty, this is not just about Trump.
Feeling like nothing makes sense anymore? Like your effort means nothing? Like the world is punishing you for doing the right thing while rewarding those who cheat, scapegoat, and exploit?
Good.
That means you're paying attention.
You're not broken for feeling disillusioned. You're not weak for feeling exhausted. You're not selfish for wondering why you should keep fighting for a system that seems unwilling to fight for you. You're just seeing clearly.
This is what it feels like to live under a slow, rolling wave of authoritarianism. It's not just jackboots and propaganda. It's the daily erosion of reality. It's being told that everything is fine while everything around you burns. It's the pressure to smile through it, to stay hopeful, to perform resistance without making anyone uncomfortable. And it's the gaslighting that tells you you're the problem for noticing any of it.
But the truth? You're jaded because you're sane. You're furious because you've been paying attention.
I. The Gaslight State: When Truth Becomes Treason
In an era where political lies are repeated more than the Pledge of Allegiance, believing what you see becomes an act of rebellion. The Trump administration’s use of disinformation wasn’t random. According to a 2025 cross-national study by Törnberg and Chueri, radical-right populists are the most consistent political liars across democracies; not centrists, not leftists (Törnberg & Chueri, 2025).
This is not a debate. It’s a psychological assault. When Trump repeated the same lies about the 2020 election over and over, belief in those lies increased among Republicans, a phenomenon known as the "illusory truth effect" (Pillai, 2024).
This tactic has precedent. Richard Hofstadter warned in The Paranoid Style in American Politics that American political life often lurches into conspiratorial frenzy when its institutions grow weak. Trump did not invent this. He merely perfected it in an era where social media made mass repetition effortless.
For those who refused to believe the lie? The cost was despair. To live in a country where truth no longer matters is to carry a constant, corrosive weight. It’s the emotional toll of being gaslit by your own government, and then told to shut up and smile.
II. The Emotional Toll: Not Burnout, Betrayal
People often call this political fatigue. It’s not. Fatigue comes from overexertion. This is betrayal. You did everything right. You believed in facts, participated in good faith, warned against danger, and then watched a government not only ignore your warnings, but mock you for caring.
Why does it feel like you’re the only one carrying the burden of awareness?
Because you are. Studies show conservatives report greater happiness than liberals not because their lives are better, but because they justify the system, no matter how broken (Napier & Jost, 2008).
System justification theory explains this: many people find comfort in believing the system is fair, even when it fails them. But those who see the cracks suffer a unique psychic burden. They can’t sleep through the sirens.
You feel like this because you can’t justify the system. Because it hurts too many people. That’s not pessimism. That’s empathy refusing to be numbed.
III. Blame the Helpless: A Gaslighter's Greatest Trick
When economies fail, pandemics rage, and democracy teeters, what does the authoritarian right do? They find someone weaker to blame.
Trans people. Immigrants. DEI. These are not the causes of your pain. They’re scapegoats, weaponized to distract you from real problems: deregulated markets, gutted social safety nets, and an elite class immune to consequences.
Trump once claimed immigrants were “infesting” the country. Tucker Carlson called DEI hiring “anti-white racism.” The Project 2025 agenda refers to gender-affirming care as “child mutilation.” None of this is accidental. It is rhetoric designed not to inform, but to displace blame.
The numbers don’t lie. Undocumented immigrants commit fewer crimes than native-born citizens (Light et al., 2020). DEI didn’t tank college attendance, soaring tuition and stagnant wages did. But facts don’t matter when you’ve convinced half the country to treat feelings of status loss like moral betrayal (Mutz, 2018).
Authoritarianism is not about truth. It’s about control. And nothing controls like fear of "them."
IV. Despair Is a Logical Response
Authoritarian systems do not just create oppression. They create exhaustion.
Drew Altman’s autopsy of America’s COVID response made it plain: Trump didn’t fail to lead—he refused to. By leaving it to the states, he created a patchwork of confusion that demoralized even the most civic-minded citizens (Altman, 2020; Kettl, 2020). The policy wasn’t incoherent by accident. It was incoherent by design—so that no one could be blamed and everyone could feel alone.
And when people feel alone, they shut down. Psychologists call this learned helplessness: when no action seems to change the outcome, people stop acting altogether.
As Paul Nail and Ian McGregor found, even liberals respond to threats by becoming more conservative (Nail et al., 2009). That is, we retreat into rigidity when the world becomes too unstable. It’s not cowardice. It’s biology.
This isn’t just personal despair. It’s collective trauma. And it spreads.
V. It’s Not You. It’s the Design.
The design of this political environment is meant to drain you. To make the truth cost too much. To make hope seem naive. To confuse principled resistance with futility.
That feeling you have? That you’re being asked to fix a system that will never benefit you, for a people who resent your very presence? That’s not delusion. That’s the byproduct of populist strongmen who reward loyalty over decency and grievance over good faith (Espinoza, 2021; Vescio & Schermerhorn, 2021).
And the platforms amplify it. Facebook’s algorithm favors outrage. Fox News monetizes grievance. X, under Elon Musk, boosts disinformation under the guise of “free speech.” The result isn’t debate. It’s demoralization.
You are not broken. You are not hysterical. You are not too sensitive.
You are waking up.
VI. Refusing to Vote Isn't Resistance, It's Surrender
There’s one more illusion we need to confront, the idea that refusing to vote at all is a form of protest. That standing apart from 'both sides' makes you neutral. It doesn’t. In an authoritarian slide, indifference is not neutral, it’s enabling.
Authoritarianism doesn’t need your vote. It thrives on your absence.
Take, for example, those who didn’t vote in 2024 because they believed Biden didn’t do enough to help Palestinians—many even labeled him “Genocide Joe.” That anger was real. The grief was justified. But the result? A vacuum where resistance could have stood. One hundred days into the next administration, we now see the consequences: sweeping crackdowns on trans identity, federal pressure on schools to erase inclusive history, restrictions on protest rights, militarized policing, and cultural institutions turned into instruments of ideology.
Sitting out because you believe “both parties are the same” might feel like moral purity, but it has consequences. The more people stay home, the easier it becomes for the worst actors to consolidate power. Every non-vote is a silent permission slip handed to those who would use it to erase your rights, rewrite history, and silence opposition.
We don’t get to choose the moment we’re born into. But we do get to choose whether we meet that moment with engagement or with silence. In the face of disinformation, the vote becomes an act of clarity. In the face of authoritarianism, it becomes an act of resistance.
Final Thought: Jaded, Not Defeated
The hardest part of gaslighting is not the lie. It’s the isolation. The feeling that no one else sees what you see, or feels what you feel.
But you are not alone.
The studies say what your bones already know: this is real. The despair is data. The exhaustion is structural. The rage is earned.
And you don’t owe the system another ounce of blind loyalty.
But if you still care? If you still ache when the wrong people get blamed, when the truth gets buried, when democracy gets laughed off as weakness—then your disillusionment isn’t a death.
It’s a beginning.
A dangerous one. For the liars.
And a liberating one. For the rest of us.
References
Altman, D. (2020). Understanding the US failure on coronavirus.
Espinoza, M. (2021). Donald Trump’s Impact on the Republican Party. Policy Studies.
Kettl, D. (2020). States Divided: The Implications of the Devolved Strategy for Responding to Covid-19. Public Administration Review.
Light, M. T., He, J., & Robey, J. P. (2020). Comparing crime rates among undocumented immigrants, legal immigrants, and native-born US citizens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Mutx, D. (2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. PNAS.
Nail, P. R., McGregor, I. et al. (2009). Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Social Cognition.
Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals?. Psychological Science.
Pillai, R. M. (2024). All the President’s Lies Repeated: Repetition, belief, and the illusory truth effect.
Törnberg, A., & Chueri, P. (2025). When Do Parties Lie? Misinformation and Radical Right Populism Across 26 Countries.
Vescio, T. K., & Schermerhorn, N. E. (2021). Hegemonic masculinity predicts 2016 and 2020 voting and candidate evaluations. PNAS.
This is brilliant. I feel seen and heard. Thank you!
I feel like we're dancing around one possible answer when I see it said that: "System justification theory explains this: many people find comfort in believing the system is fair, even when it fails them."
I think that's missing one point: "- if they believe in the system".
You can, after all, choose which system to believe in. The question is, why? Why this or that one? And can any holes be poked in your choice to draw you back from your unquestioning loyalty? And if so, which ones?
I mean, we *all* want to find comfort in the idea that the system is fair. I know I do. And making it fair is sort of the entire point of a true democracy, so yay, we all have something in common, if both sides can at least agree upon *that*.
I tend to vacillate between two states these days: absolute, total hatred for the monolith that is "the other side" (MAGA, conservatives, right-wingers, the GOP) and days where I feel like that monolith, like it or not, is made up of diverse human beings, some of whom can be reached, whose minds are not shut, who might be open to tossing around some ideas.
And that's the beginning of the end: having one conversation at a time with one person at a time, until network effects finally overwhelm the current state of affairs.
How to advance this on an individual level into say, a mass movement of simple persuasion that spreads across networks eludes me atm, but until there's some other sort of tipping point (and especially after, once there is) it's what we've got.
Looking at the other er side as the enemy is sort of just taking their own feelings and flipping them around. It doesn't solve anything, nor is it satisfying when it just devolves into things like depression and dread because we see the problems, the dangers, the likely outcomes of all of this. They don't, or they don't care.
They've basically been told not to, to trust the system and in the process (though the only real process at work here is constant, pointless, chaotic destruction, they erroneously read more into it than say, empowering and enriching the already too rich and powerful, which is the whole entire end game).
So something has to make them see it for what it really is and to start to care, like helping them to see things differently, or else it can happen through disastrous consequences too terrible to ignore or justify using their usual ritualized blame games and excuses, as it's the only other way to chip away at this madness.
The problem with the latter route to their minds is they're well-known for going, "Well, at least the libs/Blacks/browns/other outgroups of mine have got it just as bad or worse" so even through ridiculous amounts of suffering the programming remains in effect: on one side, their leaders are telling them these "sacrifices" have to made for the greater good of all - total line of bs, btw - and on the other, they're taught to see people not like them as lesser and to rejoice in their suffering, so to break out of their rightwing-imposed mold just because life has blown up in your face is not always as reliable a way to get them thinking differently as it might sound.
To say fine, let's just rejoice in *their* suffering as all the shit hits the fan might be temporarily satisfying but does nothing to fix the situation, and I want this national nightmare to end, not just brief, bitter moments of grim satisfaction pulled from the metaphorical rubble we'll all be buried under together.